<


14. ATTEMPTS AT RECOVERY (THE 1920s)

THE BIRTH OF FASCISM


CONTENTS

Poland

Hungary

Yugoslavia

Mussolini's Fascist Italy

The textual material on page below is drawn directly from my work A Moral History of Western Society © 2024, Volume Two, pages 116-120 .


POLAND

In 1919, in accordance with the Treaty of Versailles, Poland was once again a formerly recognized independent nation.  The Poles hoped that this would be the final resolution of a political humiliation lasting since the country was carved up into pieces awarded to Prussia, Russia and Austria.  Indeed, this hopefully marked the end of a long period of political decline that had been underway since the early 1600s when Poland was part of a great Eastern European Republic or Commonwealth which had it allied with Lithuania and which included the Polish heartland, the Eastern Baltic nations, Ukraine, and substantial parts of western Russia.  Now in 1919, with the goal of restoring the Polish nation, the huge problem presented itself in that no one could agree on where exactly the Polish boundaries should now be located
 
Because of the confusion caused by this problem Poland found itself immediately engaged in a series of battles with its neighbors.  Leading the Polish military effort was the Polish hero of the Great War, Jozef Pilsudski.  The biggest struggle was with Russia – itself caught up in a terrible civil war.  At first Pilsudski’s troops were able to reach deep into western Russia and Ukraine.  But then as Lenin gained greater control over Russia, the Bolsheviks were better able to turn their attentions to the Polish threat – and pushed the Poles out of Ukraine and Western Russia.  But eventually Pilsudski’s exhausted troops were able to halt an equally exhausted Bolshevik advance – providing the opportunity finally to negotiate a line of demarcation between Poland and Russia ... and at the same time to block Lenin's effort to link up militarily with Communist insurrectionists in Germany and elsewhere in Central Europe.  Thus the Polish borders were finally recognized internationally by the Treaty of Riga (1921) along a line negotiated by British Foreign Secretary, Lord Curzon.  Pilsudski and his officers had hoped for better.  But the political leaders of the Polish Republic were content – stirring feelings of hostility between the Polish military and Polish civilian leaders.

The next five years was a time in which Poland attempted to discover what it truly meant to be a modern republic – and largely failed.  The country was split politically into a number of contending power groups, and corruption within the ranks of the government was widespread.  And the military was unwilling to submit itself to civilian authority.  The blow finally came in 1926 when Pilsudski led a military coup overthrowing the civilian government – and Poland entered into a period of tight-fisted dictatorship under Pilsudski that lasted until his death in 1935.  Some degree of unity was forced on Poland, and it did undergo some economic growth – though not nearly at the rate that its population was growing.  Also it lived a very precarious existence squeezed between two naturally hostile powers, Germany and Russia.  Non-aggression pacts were signed with both countries.  But as events would soon prove, these pacts were meaningless.
 

Marshall Jozef Pilsudski at the time of his military takeover of Poland (May 1926)

Marshall Jozef Pilsudski - President of Poland (1920 - 1935)


HUNGARY

But the colonistsWhen the newly instituted Hungarian Republic (carved out of the former Austro-Hungarian Empire) proved unable to protect itself from the seizing of Hungarian territory by its new neighbors Poland, Czechoslovakia and Romania, the Communists took over the government.   The Communist leader Béla Kun, a close friend of Lenin’s, attempted to reorganize Hungary along Soviet lines ... but succeeded only in throwing the economy into massive inflation and disarray.  He then in the summer of 1919 attempted to carry the Communist challenge into Rumania ... but in realizing his motives much of his army deserted and the Rumanians drove his weakened army into humiliating retreat.  This soon undercut the last of his support in Budapest and he and other Communist leaders were forced to flee Hungary.

This in turn inspired a campaign of violence (the 'White Terror') against Communists ... but also against leftist Socialists and even Jews ...when Hungarian war hero Admiral Miklós Horthy was invited to take control of Hungary as 'Regent.'  Horthy took the side of social-political conservatism and soon brought the country under his control, arresting massive numbers of radicals and liberals.   He also undid most of the liberal reforms enacted during Kun’s rule, including very importantly Kun’s land reform, turning the land back over to the tiny but highly privileged class of landowners ... and as a result setting up a political controversy that would shake the country during the entire 1920s and 1930s.  This in turn drove the Horthy regime deeper into Fascism ... and a second ill-fated alliance with Germany. 
Another place where the Communists briefly seized power (21 March to 6 August 1919) was the newly independent Hungary

Béla Kun was the leader of the Communist Hungarian Revolution of 1919

Hungarian communist politician and journalist Béla Kun (1923).  Briefly head of the Hungarian Soviet Republic (1919)

Communist troops in Budapest (1919)
The Communist revolution in Hungary was actually crushed in 1919 by an invading Romanian army

Admiral Miklós Horthy - Regent of Hungary (1920-1944)
He took over the country in order to swing it back to traditionalism


YUGOSLAVIA

Much like the other new states carved out of the divided up Austro-Hungarian Empire, Yugoslavia was itself actually a mix of a number of national subgroups, the most prominent being the dominant Serbs, but also the highly national self-aware Croatians and Slovenes (plus the Montenegrins, Macedonians, Muslim Bosnians, Albanian Kosovars, Hungarians and others).  On top of this, the country was divided into contending religious groups, 47% Eastern Orthodox, 39% Catholic and 11% Muslim.

Holding it all together was a constitutional monarchy, with the Serbian heir to the throne, Alexander, as king.  The democratic aspect of the constitution was truly beyond the comprehension of the largely illiterate population and the national legislature in the capital Belgrade (also the Serbian capital) seemed to be responsive to no other interests than its own Serbian agenda.  Finally in 1929 King Alexander simply suspended the constitution and attempted to enact social reforms on his own in the hopes of pulling his kingdom together ... then granting the country a new constitution in 1931 which changed very little about how the kingdom was actually governed.

Alexander’s attempt to soften the cultural divisions actually seemed only to make them worse, driving the national groups into a stronger defensive posture as they sensed his effort to undercut their spirit of nationalism.

When Alexander was assassinated in 1934, his son Peter was too young to take the throne … so a Regency under Alexander’s cousin, Prince Paul, was established.  Paul attempted to appease the minority nationalists by granting greater local autonomy ... especially to the most vocal of the national subgroups, the Croats.  But this only irritated the Slovenes all the more when the same rights were not immediately extended to them.  But then before that challenge could be addressed World War Two intervened, and the political agenda changed drastically.


MUSSOLINI'S FASCIST ITALY

Post-war frustration in Italy

Though on the "winning" side of the Great War, Italy was as convulsed by political and social problems as the "losers."  Italy had joined the Entente of Britain and France in 1915 on the promise that Italy would receive a number of pieces of neighboring territories as part of an expanded Italy.  But the assignment at the war’s end of the province of Fiume (along the northern Adriatic coast near Venice) to the new Yugoslavia rather than to Italy became a major sore point – exploited by the Italian adventurer Gabriele d’Annunzio who seized the territory and named himself its Duce (Italian: "Leader") and began promoting a philosophy of national unity through strength – a political idealism attempting to transcend the violent industrial class politics which had set in heavily in Italy, much as in Russia and Germany.  D’Annunzio was eventually deposed by the Italian military – but not before his philosophy had caught the attention of another aspiring Italian politician, Benito Mussolini.

Mussolini

Mussolini had started out as a Socialist propagandist (newspaper editor) – who turned against Socialism when it refused to support the Italian entry into the Great War.  Mussolini saw the war as a means of bringing Italy to a new strength and prominence:  strength through collective struggle (Fascism).  Mussolini became bitterly opposed to Marxist Socialism, with its call to European workers to resist taking up arms on behalf of capitalist war profiteers (a call which Europe's fiercely nationalist workers largely ignored.)  But Mussolini was opposed not only to Socialist pacifism, he was as opposed to Liberal Idealism with its hopes to build an international order of peace through a new spirit of international democratic cooperation.  Mussolini accused such philosophies of peace as merely weakening human strength and producing effete societies.  He exalted strength – strength through conflict, strength through struggle which would produce a warlike character among a people.  This would in turn would bring them to unity (fascism)
1 and greatness – greatness such as the ancient Romans had once exemplified.  The key to this process was achieving an absolute unity of the people through unswerving loyalty to a great leader, a ‘Duce’ such as Mussolini himself proposed to become.  He promised Italians (prominently Italy's industrial leaders) to bring unity to Italy through a policy of strict enforcement of social unity through the use of his street ‘toughs’ (the "Blackshirts") who stood ready to strike total fear in the hearts of labor agitators and anarchists through whatever means were necessary to do so.

The Fascist takeover of Italy (1922)

At a time when Italy seemed to be threatened internally by the same forces tearing Russia and Germany apart, this Fascist call of Mussolini's had a very strong appeal.  The Fascists actually ran as a regular political party in the 1921 elections, gaining 31 seats (including Mussolini’s) in the Italian parliament.  Mussolini began bullying the government, demanding control of the state. Finally in September of 1922 some ten thousand Fascists descended on Rome ... but King Victor Emmanuel would not grant Prime Minister Facta the right to call out the army.  As more Fascists gathered over the next couple of days, Facta resigned. The king now asked Mussolini to "save" the nation by becoming its new prime minister (and also the head of the home and foreign ministries).

Italy now began to head down the path of Fascism – forced national unity under the domination of the Duce, who was to do the thinking and direct all the actions of the Italian nation.  Any resistance to his program, actively or even just verbally, was met with stiff repression.  Military and police commands were put in the hands of Fascists.  Opponents were beaten (even the famous Italian philosopher Benedetto Croce).  The vocal opponent of Fascism, Matteotti, was even murdered in order to silence him, sending a clear message to anyone else daring to be so outspoken.  But this only pushed Mussolini to become even more absolutist, shutting down all opposition newspapers and eventually in 1926 outlawing all political parties other than the Fascists.  Industrial workers and owners organizations were taken over by Fascists ... under the excuse that they needed to be redirected in their work toward serving the Fascist state, the only true protector of the Italian nation.

Gradually, a degree of social order was brought to Italian social life ... but at the cost of personal freedoms.  Yet Mussolini moved – by way of the 1929 Lateran Treaty with the Vatican – to end the standoff between the Italian state and the Catholic church ... supporting religious education, Catholic marriage and the church’s property rights.  The relationship was not always smooth.  But at least the church-state divorce was over.


1From the Italian fascio or bundle … and also from the ancient Roman fasces or bundle of rods with an axe head lashed tightly together by leather thongs – which was carried into battle by a Roman commander.




40,000 Black-shirted supporters of Mussolini march on Rome -- October 28, 1922

Mussolini marching with Fascists soon after his October 28, 1922 "March on Rome"

Mussolini greeted by King Victor Emmanuel III

Mussolini at a Fascist Rally




Go on to the next section:  The Non-Western World

  Miles H. Hodges