7. EXPANSION ... AND DIVISION
THE GROWING CONFLICT OVER SLAVERY
CONTENTS
The Abolitionist Movement
The election of 1848
The textual material on this webpage is drawn directly from my work
America – The Covenant Nation © 2021, Volume One, pages 261-266.
A Timeline of Major Events during this period
1830s |
Violence now accompanies the slavery debate
1837 Alton newspaper publisher and preacher Elija Lovejoy (Alton, Illinois) is murdered on the fourth assault on his
newspaper by a proslavery mob furious over his Abolitionism
|
1840s |
The Abolitionist Movement gathers strength; but the issue is still too much for most Americans
1830s-1840s The examples of Britain ending slavery in its country (1807) and then in its overseas Empire (1833) and the French doing the same in France itself (1794) and then in its overseas colonies (1848) only pushes the Abolitionists to press harder for the American abolition of slavery
For many
Americans, the ongoing Christian "Second Great Awakening" also inspires
them to take a strong anti-slavery position
1845 Frederick Douglass's autobiographies (1845 and 1855) of his life as a
slave sell big in the north
1848 However ... the tameness of the 1848 presidential elections and the victory of the Mexican warhero Taylor – whose views on the slavery issue are largely unknown – indicates a general desire of most Americans to move past the burning issue of slavery
|
THE
ABOLITIONIST MOVEMENT |

Slave ship loaded with African slaves
![]() 
A slave auction
In the meantime, American culture was splitting
ever more deeply over this persistent question about Americans holding
slaves. There was no way that the problem was going to simply go away
on its own or just be avoided, as many Americans had earlier held the
hope that this might be possible. But high-sounding principle was
easier to achieve than actual plans of action.1
Unfortunately, such a large part of American culture (especially in the
South and parts of the West) was built on ideals requiring the labor
services, voluntary or involuntary, of other people. To undo such a
social system was to destroy the cultural ideals of economic and social
success themselves.
But there also was no way that the spirit
of Puritan Protestantism widespread in the North could ever come to
tolerate intellectually and emotionally this behavior in the land of
freedom. Slavery violated every Christian sensibility of the
Northerners, to a point that some in the North grew increasingly
impatient at the willingness of even their own Northern
politicians to tolerate or ignore this stain, this sin corrupting the
soul of the great American nation. Americans were understood to be a
Covenant people called to display to the world the glories of living as
Christ's people, to be a light spreading hope into the darkness of the
surrounding world. Surely slavery made a mockery of this Covenant. Some
felt very strongly that God would curse the nation for breaking this
Covenant that their forefathers had agreed to two centuries earlier.
And the Republic that had been put into place only a few generations
back, a Republic dedicated to the high calling of being a light to the
nations, would fail ... fail miserably. Thus the institution of slavery
had to be abolished immediately. And so it was that those who advocated
such action came to be called Abolitionists.
Abolitionism and the Second Great Awakening
In fact, many Abolitionists saw in
slavery the seeds of certain destruction of the American people and
society, by the hand of God no less. Indeed, the religious fervor of
the Second Great Awakening, which continued to burn forward through the
1830s, 1840s and 1850s, had made slavery its main hot-button issue.
Preachers, newspapermen, self-appointed social reformers and even a
small handful of congressmen saw this issue intimately tied up with how
God was looking in judgment at his Covenant people. America could not
afford to lose its soul over this issue.
In general however, aggressive
Abolitionists were not widely popular, not even in the North at first.
They were viewed as being dangerously disruptive of the good order of
the Republic. Those who viewed themselves as being of a wiser nature
tended to presume that the good moral sense of Americans would
eventually work this problem out. Thus it was in 1836 that Congress had
placed its gag rule on any further discussion of the slavery issue.
Nonetheless, the issue was a big part of what would go on to divide the
New School and Old School Presbyterians in the late 1830s, the division
tending to follow North-South lines. Likewise, in 1845, the Baptists
also split quite permanently along North-South lines over the matter.
Then also there was the fact that the
English had already set the noble example in 1807 by abolishing slavery
within England and then in 1833 by extending abolition to the entire
British Empire. France had outlawed slavery as far back as 1794 during
the French Republican Revolution (though Napoleon had reintroduced the
practice somewhat after 1804) and in 1848 France made the move to
abolish slavery throughout all of its colonies. Thus also to the
American Humanists, America's failure to follow the moral example of
England and France brought unbearable shame to America as the supposed
model of Enlightened Republicanism.
Most American supporters of freedom for
the slaves advocated a gradual process of emancipation. They considered
this to be the more responsible solution to the problem. Others
supported the idea of sending Blacks, both free or slave, back to
Africa where it was supposed there would be a more natural fit for
them. Thus Liberia had been established in 1820 by President Monroe
(and thus Liberia's capital Monrovia) as a resettlement colony on the
West coast of Africa.
Abolitionist voices. However, the Abolitionist
William Lloyd Garrison, founder of the American Anti-Slavery Society
and publisher of the newspaper, The Liberator,
wanted abolition to occur immediately and fully. He even went so far as
to accuse the U.S. Constitution of being a pact with slavery. This
ranked him among the most radical of the Abolitionists.
A number of other newspapermen, such as Horace Greeley, editor of The New York Tribune,
were also constant in their verbal assault on the vile practice of
slavery. But this could be a very dangerous issue for newspapermen to
pursue. In 1837 an angry pro-slavery mob attacked the newspaper office
of the Alton (Illinois) Observer run by the Abolitionist and
Presbyterian preacher Elijah Parish Lovejoy, the fourth such attack on
him and his press. But this time they murdered him, making him a martyr
to the Abolitionist cause and pushing his brother Owen into the
leadership of the Illinois Abolitionists.
1Jefferson,
for instance, though admitting the wrong of slavery, could not bring
himself to free his slaves. Instead, in his will, he required the sale of
his slaves to other slaveholders to pay for the debts he had run up by
constantly redesigning his Monticello home in his effort to perfect it
as a miniature utopia.
|
| |